Skip to Content  |  Web Policy  |  Contact Us
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality's logo

Protecting, restoring, and strengthening our coastal ecosystems and economy


Virginia Coastal Program: 2003 Coastal Grant Project Description and Final Summary

Project Task:

FY2003 Task 10

Grantee:

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

Project Title:

2003 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Distribution and Abundance Survey of Chesapeake Bay, its Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay

Project Description as Proposed:

Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) is a critical living resource in Virginia’s coastal waters that has undergone rapid and dramatic fluctuations in distribution and abundance over the last two decades. It is being subjected to declines in water quality and to ever increasing pressure from recreational, commercial, and industrial demands. Because SAV is dependent on good water quality to which it responds over short time scales, it can be an important indicator of water quality.

In 2003, VIMS will continue the annual SAV survey program, begun in 1984, by mapping SAV in the shoal areas of the entire Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as well as Chincoteague Bay from aerial photography acquired during late spring to late summer.

Black & white aerial photography will be acquired at a photographic scale of approximately 1:24,000, following guidelines that address tidal stage, plant growth, sun angle, turbidity, wind, atmospheric transparency, sensor operation and land features to allow for acquisition of photographs under near optimal conditions.

For Virginia waters, the first priority will be obtaining data from the mainstem Chesapeake Bay shorelines. The second priority will be obtaining data for the Chesapeake Bay embayments on the Eastern Shore. The third priority will be obtaining data from the upper tidal portions of the major western shore tributaries (James, York, Rappahnannock).

Ground data on species distribution and abundance will be collected by participating agencies and citizen groups from as many of the Chesapeake Bay Program segments as possible.

The aerial photographs will be evaluated for SAV signatures using all available information. Photographs containing SAV signatures will be orthographically corrected and mosaiced by USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles using Orthobase and Imagine image processing software .

The perimeters of all SAV beds mapped from the 2003 aerial photography will be delineated on-screen using ArcInfo geographic information system (GIS) software and stored in an ArcInfo GIS database. Preliminary maps will be posted to the VIMS SAV web page (www.vims.edu/bio/sav) during the digitization process.

VIMS will maintain and update, as necessary, a Quality Assurance Project Plan detailing the quality control procedures followed to insure proper acquisition of aerial photography and accurate mapping and digitization of data under this scope of work.

The contribution of CZM federal funds is for partial financial support of this multi-funded program. Completion of the other tasks required to produce the above deliverables is dependent upon acquiring the remainder of the funds from other state and federal sources. Funding is expected from the Maryland's Department of Natural Resources (from Maryland Coastal Zone Management Grant), and US EPA’s Chesapeake Bay Program.

Federal Funding:

$59,010

Project Contact:

Bob Orth, 804.684.7392, jjorth@vims.edu

Project Status:

Grant Closed

Final Product Received:

Project Summary Provided by Grantee:

The distribution of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) in Chesapeake Bay, its tributaries, and the coastal bays of the Delmarva Peninsula, was mapped from black and white aerial photographs. These were taken between May and November 2003, at a scale of 1:24,000, encompassing 193 flight lines. In addition, color aerial photography acquired by St. Mary's County, Maryland and the Metro Washington Council of Governments provided coverage for sections of the lower Potomac River.
For 2003, 24,966 hectares (61,694 ac) of SAV were mapped in Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. However some portions of the Bay were not flown due to adverse weather in the spring and summer and Hurricane Isabel in the fall. These regions, including Tavern and Swan creeks; lower Chester River; upper Wicomico River; Prentice, Dividing, and Ball creeks; Dameron Marsh; and Great Wicomico River were not fully mapped in 2003. These regions had 1,220 ha of SAV in 2002 (3,015 ac, 3% of the 2002 total).

In order to ensure a valid analysis of change in SAV distribution and abundance given the reduced region mapped in 2003, all direct comparisons to previous years in the report are restricted to only those regions that were mapped in both years. Partial totals for 2002 have been computed for CBP segments, Bay zones, and the entire Bay using only those regions mapped for both years.

Significant changes in SAV distribution were measured between 2002 and 2003. SAV decreased 30% (10,576 ha, 26,134 ac) in the regions mapped for both years.
SAV decreased in all three zones (Upper, Middle, and Lower) geographic zones delineated for Chesapeake Bay. In 2003, SAV increased in 12, decreased in 42, and remained unvegetated in 24 of the 78 CBP segments

In the Upper Bay Zone (17 CBP segments extending south from the Susquehanna River to the Chester and Magothy rivers), 4,215 hectares (10,416 ac) of SAV were mapped for 2003. However, portions of the zone, including the upper central Chesapeake Bay and the lower Chester River, representing 64 ha (157 ac, 1.2% of the zone total) of SAV in 2002 were not mapped for 2003. Comparing the same mapped regions between 2002 and 2003, SAV declined from 5,264 hectares (13,009 ac) in 2002 to 4,200 hectares (10,378 ac) in 2003. In the Middle Bay Zone (34 CBP segments extending south from the Bay Bridge to the Rappahannock River and Pocomoke Sound, and including the Potomac River), 12,333 hectares (30,475 ac) of SAV were mapped for 2003. However, portions of the zone, including upper Wicomico River; Prentice, Dividing, and Ball creeks; Dameron Marsh; and Great Wicomico River representing 1,157 ha (2,858 ac, 5.4% of the zone total) of SAV in 2002 were not mapped for 2003. Comparing the same mapped regions between 2002 and 2003, SAV decreased 41% from 20,280 (50,115 ac) in 2002 to 11,869 (50,115 ac) in 2003. In the Lower Bay Zone (27 CBP segments covering the region south from the Rappahannock River and Pocomoke Sound regions to the mouth of the Bay), 8,418 hectares (20,803 ac) were mapped for 2003. SAV decreased 12% (1,100 ha, 2,718 ac) in 2003. In the Delmarva Peninsula Coastal Bays Zone (Assawoman, Isle of Wight, Sinepuxent, Chincoteague, and Southern Virginia Coastal Bays) 7,414 hectares (18,320 ac) were mapped in 2003, a 1% (94 ha, 233 ac) increase from the 2002 level of 7,319 hectares (18,087 ac). Most of the SAV mapped in the southern Virginia Seaside Bays (or Atlantic Coast Bays) segment were the result of successful restoration efforts initiated in 1997 through the Virginia Coastal Program's.

The aerial survey is critical because the 1992 amendments to Chesapeake Bay Agreement uses the distribution and abundance of SAV as documented by the baywide aerial survey as an initial measure of progress in the restoration of living resources and water quality.

The final report and GIS datasets are available on the Internet at http://www.vims.edu/bio/sav/sav03

 

Form C end

Disclaimer: This project summary provides the federal dollars initially awarded to the grantee. Due to underexpenditure or reprogramming of grant funds, this figure may change. For more information on the allocation of coastal grant funds, please contact Laura McKay, Virginia Coastal Program Manager, at 804.698.4323 or email: Laura.McKay@deq.virginia.gov

A more detailed Scope of Work for this project is available. Please direct your request for a copy to Virginia.Witmer@deq.virginia.gov